ALBION — The Noble County Commissioners decided Monday to work with a group of Second Amendment Sanctuary advocates to draft a resolution that supports honoring Constitutional rights, but stopped short of the ordinance that would make the county a Second Amendment Sanctuary county.

The resolution will be discussed in the April 9 meeting.

Scott Peters, the movement’s spokesman who was joined by about a half dozen supporters, gave the commissioners a ready-made, two-page ordinance. Peters said his group is concerned that their right to bear arms will be infringed on by proponents of stricter gun control. He cited Virginia as an example.

“If anything bad happens, we, the good gun owners, get punished,” Peters said.

Jim Nixon of Kendallville, a retired East Noble principal with 29 years of experience, spoke against the ordinance. Nixon noted that schools have a difficult time keeping out a person with a weapon in spite of the security measures taken since the Columbine shooting. He said an officer with a weapon was not a deterrent to the shooter at Parkland.

Nixon said there are 25 amendments to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights to protect voting rights and due process of law.

“I want our county to be a sanctuary for the First Amendment,” he said.

Nixon said he respected the Constitution, including the Second Amendment, but doesn’t “place the Second Amendment higher on the shelf than any other.” He said the Heller case in the U.S. Supreme Court decided the issue of having a firearm in a person’s home for self-defense.

“They can have a firearm in their house,” he said. “But I’m not excited about the weapons of war. There are 15 million AR-15s in the United States. I’m reluctant to have the county invite in any and all kinds of firearms.”

Nixon said the ordinance would crack the door open for an ordinance for every amendment. A sanctuary ordinance would not reflect well on the county when trying to attract businesses and people to locate here.

Commission Gary Leatherman asked what the ordinance would change.

“What changes from what the Constitution says?” he asked. “All of us sitting here support the Constitution,” referring to the oath of office when elected officials are sworn in.

Group members said the ordinance was “symbolic” but the movement is about assurance that their Second Amendment rights are untouched.

Recommended for you

(3) comments

ruffhouse

"Saving Your Neighborhood Children Takes Five Minutes"

Dear school board member, (Dear state legislator,)

I was lied to. We were promised that students would be safer once we made it illegal for honest adults to carry guns on, or near, a school campus. Well that promise sure didn’t work. The US Department of Justice reports that almost all the active shooter incidents took place in “gun-free” zones. A quarter of those incidents took place in our schools.

That is unacceptable.

It is a nice letter, but it is meaningless without you. You can make it powerful. It takes one letter and a week, but you can change lives. Here is what you do with five minutes a day.

I offer you the words, but your actions make it politically powerful.

Go save lives.

https://slowfacts.wordpress.com/2016/08/14/save-the-children-in-your-neighborhood-with-five-minutes-a-day/

ruffhouse

Depending on Federal Judges to Protect Your Gun Rights Is a Bad Plan.

This is a really bad strategy.

At its core, the Second Amendment exists as a limit on federal authority. When you sue in federal court, you do so in the hope that the federal government will limit itself.

Remember, federal courts operate as part of the federal government, and federal judges are nothing more than politically connected lawyers drawing federal paychecks. When we keep these facts in mind, it becomes pretty obvious we shouldn’t count on federal courts to limit federal power, and uphold or preserve the Second Amendment.

James Madison gave us the blueprint. When the federal government commits unwarrantable acts, the Father of the Constitution didn’t say “file a lawsuit in federal court.” Madison advised a refusal to cooperate with officers of the union. Don’t depend on politically connected lawyers to protect your right to keep and bear arms.

http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2016/06/depending-on-federal-judges-to-protect-your-gun-rights-is-a-bad-plan/

ruffhouse

It's a Trap! 2nd Amendment Sanctuaries Threaten Gun Rights

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOhdcNR1bK8

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.